American families are reading to their preschool-aged children substantially less frequently than they did before the COVID-19 pandemic, and these shared reading routines have failed to rebound in the years since, according to a comprehensive national study. The findings have sparked deep concern among early childhood specialists who emphasize that shared reading at home provides an essential foundation for vocabulary growth, linguistic development, and long-term literacy skills.
The investigation, conducted by the National Institute for Early Education Research (NIEER), evaluated five continuous years of survey responses gathered from parents across the United States. The resulting data illustrates a lasting shift in domestic literacy habits, demonstrating that a core practice of early childhood parenting suffered an abrupt decline during the initial disruption and has remained suppressed ever since.
Before the pandemic took hold in 2019, approximately 85 percent of preschool-aged children throughout the country were read to by a parent or caregiver at least three times per week. However, the study revealed that between the autumn of 2020 and 2025, that proportion dropped significantly and never managed to climb above the 75 percent mark.
The downward trend has shown further signs of deterioration in the most up-to-date figures. According to Steven Barnett, the founder of NIEER and an education economist at Rutgers University who co-authored the report, the most recently available survey metrics indicate that only 69 percent of parents are currently reading to their young children on a frequent basis.
Education researchers consider this protracted drop especially alarming due to the vital role early shared reading plays in childhood cognitive development. Consistent engagement with books during the preschool years accelerates language acquisition, strengthens comprehension, and equips young learners with the essential skills required for a smooth transition into elementary education.
Barnett underscored the seriousness of the trend, pointing out that meaningful parent-child interaction at home serves as one of the most powerful catalysts for early learning. When such daily educational engagements diminish on a national scale, the developmental gap left behind can have far-reaching effects on an entire cohort of children.
The study identified several cascading disruptions that contributed to this persistent downward shift. The sudden onset of the pandemic upended structured household routines and drastically altered parent work schedules. Simultaneously, widespread community closures reduced public library access and triggered notable drops in early childhood program enrollments, weakening the broader infrastructure supporting family reading.
The researchers also highlighted children's rising screen time as an influential factor linked to the literacy decline. The NIEER analysis documented a strong negative association between higher daily media consumption and lower rates of parent-child reading, aligning with wider international research that has linked increased digital device use with falling reading engagement across diverse student populations.
While the data firmly ties elevated screen exposure to less frequent book reading, Barnett noted that researchers have yet to pinpoint the exact causal mechanism. He explained that digital entertainment may simply be crowding out reading time during the day, or it could reflect broader household patterns where more permissive screen habits coincide with less emphasis on structured shared reading routines.
The NIEER findings identified key socioeconomic variables as the most potent predictors of family reading frequency. Specifically, higher parental education levels and higher overall household income emerged as the two strongest determining factors in whether a caregiver reads three or more books to a preschooler each week.
The study also observed notable differences across demographic lines, with Black and Hispanic households initially reporting lower reading frequencies than non-Hispanic white households. However, the researchers discovered that the statistical gap between Black and white families vanished once the analysis accounted for socioeconomic factors, daily family activities, and the presence of physical books inside the home.
In contrast, the reading disparity for Hispanic households persisted even after researchers controlled for those same socioeconomic and environmental factors. Barnett noted that this discrepancy suggests other distinct variables may be at work, such as a shortage of culturally relevant reading materials or parental perspectives regarding language development in dual-language households, both of which require further targeted research.
On the other hand, the study pinpointed multiple home characteristics that markedly increased the probability of frequent reading. Children who were actively enrolled in formal early education programs, resided in homes with a larger supply of physical books, and engaged regularly in indoor and outdoor active play showed significantly higher odds of being read to multiple times per week.
The report's conclusions mirror a broader slide in student reading achievement observed across both national and global assessments. In Michigan, for instance, state-level evaluation metrics reflect a continuing drop in elementary literacy; the most recent Michigan Student Test of Educational Progress (M-STEP) results revealed that third-grade English Language Arts proficiency sank to 38.2 percent, representing the lowest passing rate recorded in the assessment's 12-year history.
Because early home literacy serves as the primary bedrock for future classroom success, education experts warn that the ongoing reduction in preschool reading could deepen long-term learning deficits if left unaddressed. Re-establishing regular reading habits within households and expanding community access to early educational resources remain critical steps in supporting the nation's youngest learners.
(0)