The White House signaled late Friday that CNN will not be carried aboard Air Force One during President Donald Trump's scheduled Saturday trip to Knoxville, Tennessee, the latest move in an escalating dispute between the administration and news organizations that raises First Amendment questions about newsgathering access to the president.
The decision, conveyed through White House travel guidance, replaces CNN with Real America's Voice News, a conservative-leaning network. It marks a widening of the administration's restrictions on media access at a time when the president's public schedule is packed with high-profile events.
Trump's Saturday itinerary centers on a college football game between the University of Tennessee and the University of Texas, scheduled for midday. The trip also gives the White House a fresh opportunity to test the boundaries of a court order that has already forced it to soften a separate element of the same broader crackdown.
That element came earlier in the week. Trump last week banned journalists from CNN, along with MS NOW and Politico, from the White House grounds. Hours before the Air Force One announcement, reporters from all three organizations were back on the executive complex, carrying television cameras, laptops and microphones, after a federal judge granted them a temporary reprieve.
U.S. District Judge Timothy Kelly issued the ruling overnight into early Thursday, temporarily striking down the grounds ban. The order addressed the status of "hard passes," the credentials that allow designated journalists routine access to the White House grounds.
Legal observers noted two significant limits embedded in the decision. The judge's ruling did not directly address pool duties, the rotating group of reporters who travel with the president, and the temporary order said nothing at all about Air Force One. That narrowness has left open the question of whether the administration is free to continue excluding a particular outlet from the president's travel even while the grounds ban is suspended.
The news organizations' lawyers maintain that the ruling is broader than it appears. Theodore Boutrous Jr., an attorney for the plaintiffs, said earlier Friday on CNN's "The Lead with Jake Tapper" that the plaintiffs believe the recent court decision also covers the question of pool access — the journalists who accompany the president on domestic and overseas trips under White House arrangements.
Boutrous did not immediately respond to an email and phone call from The Associated Press seeking comment on Friday night. The White House also did not immediately respond to questions about the decision to exclude CNN from the aircraft.
The split between the two access channels matters because they are granted through different mechanisms. Hard passes are a credentialing matter tied to physical entry to the executive complex, while the traveling press pool is organized by the White House, which selects a limited number of journalists and restricts how many reporters any single outlet may send. A court order touching the first does not necessarily bind the second.
Still, the administration's choice of an already-banned outlet for the exclusion suggests the Air Force One decision is part of the same broader posture rather than an isolated scheduling call. The timing — coming directly on the heels of a judge's intervention — is likely to be read by the outlets as a deliberate test of the court's reach.
The dispute lands in a week of intense presidential activity on the world stage. On Friday, Trump's motorcade departed the White House for the National Archives, where he greeted Chinese President Xi Jinping and Xi's wife, Peng Liyuan, in Washington. The high-profile diplomatic meeting underscored how consequential the president's movements have become as a backdrop for media access fights.
Constitutional scholars have long treated restrictions on presidential travel coverage as a First Amendment concern, since the ability of journalists to observe and question the president depends in part on physical proximity. The government has wide latitude in managing security and logistics, but the argument goes, that discretion does not extend to suppressing particular viewpoints or outlets.
The immediate question now is whether the three outlets will return to court in Maryland to seek broader relief that would explicitly cover pool assignments and travel aboard Air Force One. Any such motion would test whether Judge Kelly's temporary reprieve was a narrow fix to a credentialing rule or a broader statement on the administration's authority to exclude individual news organizations.
For now, the practical effect is limited but visible: when Air Force One lifts off for Knoxville on Saturday, one of the outlets that won a legal reprieve on the ground will not be on board the aircraft. The ruling that returned their cameras to the White House complex did nothing to put them back on the flight, and the White House has offered no indication that it intends to revisit that distinction before the weekend is over.
(0)